Solutions & Services for ICS/OT, IoT, IIoT & Smart Cities
ARC.Secure delivers comprehensive cybersecurity solutions that protect critical infrastructure without disrupting operations. Our plant-safe methodologies ensure resilient operations while maintaining compliance with industry standards and regulatory requirements.
Solution Matrix
This matrix demonstrates how our integrated approach addresses every critical aspect of industrial cybersecurity, from initial asset discovery through continuous monitoring and incident response. Each solution component works synergistically to create a comprehensive defense strategy tailored to your operational environment.
ARC.Discovery
Passive asset identification and network topology mapping without disrupting operations. Safety guardrails ensure zero impact on production systems.
ARC.Diag
Comprehensive vulnerability assessment and maturity scoring aligned to industry standards. Prioritized roadmap development with funding recommendations.
ARC.Pentest
Controlled exploit validation using digital twins and lab environments. Purple team exercises with defendable objectives and rollback procedures.
ARC.Lab
Safe testing environments for patches, procedures, and training scenarios. Digital replicas of manufacturing environments ensure realistic validation.
ARC.Simulatior
Crisis exercises combining tabletop discussions with hands-on technical response. Cross-team communication validation and playbook refinement.
ARC.Monitor
Continuous 24/7 surveillance with protocol-aware detection and automated response capabilities. Closed-loop improvement based on threat intelligence.
ARC.Discovery - Complete Asset Visibility
Continuous, passive asset discovery that creates your single source of truth OT CMDB
ARC.Discovery provides comprehensive, non-intrusive asset identification across your entire industrial network. Using advanced passive monitoring techniques including SPAN/TAP analysis, deep packet inspection, and network metadata correlation, we map your complete OT infrastructure without any risk to operational systems.
Who it's for: OT managers, plant engineers, and CISOs requiring complete asset visibility for security and compliance initiatives. Ideal for organizations with legacy systems, shadow OT devices, or complex multi-vendor environments.
Outcomes & KPIs:
  • 95%+ asset inventory accuracy within 30 days
  • Discovery of 25-40% previously unknown shadow OT devices
  • Dynamic topology mapping with real-time updates
  • Firmware version tracking and vulnerability correlation
  • Protocol-aware communication analysis and zone validation
Plant-Safe Methods: Exclusively passive monitoring using network taps and span ports. No active scanning, no device polling, and no protocol interactions that could disrupt operations. All data collection occurs outside the production network path.
Standards Mapping: Directly supports NIST CSF 2.0 Identify functions (ID.AM-1 through ID.AM-6), IEC 62443-3-3 SR 7.1 (Human User Identification), and CMMC AC.L2-3.1.1 (System and User Activity Monitoring).

Sample CMDB Output: Asset type, make/model, firmware version, communication protocols, Purdue zone/level assignment, criticality scoring, and maintenance window alignment.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Will discovery activities impact our production systems?
A: No. ARC.Discovery uses exclusively passive monitoring techniques that observe network traffic without any interaction with production devices or protocols.
Q: How quickly can we see initial results?
A: Initial asset inventory appears within 24-48 hours, with comprehensive discovery typically complete within 2-3 weeks depending on network complexity.
Q: What data do you need from our side?
A: Network architecture diagrams, VLAN configurations, and read-only access to network infrastructure for tap/span deployment. No credentials or device access required.
ARC.Diag - Strategic Risk Assessment & Roadmap
ARC.Diag combines comprehensive attack-surface analytics with plant-safe vulnerability scanning and maturity scoring to deliver prioritized, funded roadmaps aligned to industry standards. This strategic assessment transforms complex technical findings into executive-ready action plans.
Who it's for: CISOs, compliance officers, and plant managers preparing for audits or developing multi-year security investment strategies. Essential for organizations pursuing CMMC certification, IEC 62443 compliance, or NIST CSF 2.0 implementation.
Outcomes & KPIs:
  • Prioritized remediation roadmap with cost-benefit analysis
  • 90%+ first-pass audit success rate
  • 30% reduction in vulnerability remediation time
  • Standards-aligned maturity scoring across all domains
  • Maintenance window optimization for security updates
Plant-Safe Methods: Vulnerability scanning occurs only during planned maintenance windows with full rollback procedures. Attack-surface analysis uses passive network data and configuration reviews without active probing.
Standards Mapping: Comprehensive alignment with NIST CSF 2.0 Govern and Identify functions, IEC 62443-2-1 security management requirements, CMMC practices across all domains, and sector-specific overlays including NERC CIP, HIPAA/HITECH, and FDA 21 CFR Part 11.
85%
Compliance Gap Reduction
Average improvement in standards alignment within 90 days of roadmap implementation
$2.4M
Average
ROI
Documented return on investment through optimized security spending and avoided incidents
Key Questions Answered
Q: How do you ensure scanning doesn't disrupt operations?
A: All active scanning occurs only during pre-approved maintenance windows with plant personnel present and immediate rollback capabilities tested and ready.
Q: What's included in the remediation roadmap?
A: Prioritized action items with cost estimates, resource requirements, maintenance window alignment, and business impact analysis for each recommendation.
Q: How often should assessments be repeated?
A: Annually for comprehensive reviews, with quarterly updates for high-risk environments or those undergoing significant infrastructure changes.
ARC.Pentest - Controlled Exploit Validation
Rules of Engagement
Comprehensive safety protocols and testing boundaries established before any assessment activities. Clear escalation procedures and emergency stop mechanisms.
Purple Team Approach
Collaborative red and blue team exercises with defendable objectives. Joint learning sessions that improve both offensive and defensive capabilities.
ARC.Lab Pre-validation
All exploits tested first in digital twin environments before any controlled production testing. Zero-risk validation of attack paths and defensive controls.
ARC.Pentest delivers realistic threat validation through carefully controlled penetration testing that prioritizes operational safety above all else. Our purple teaming methodology ensures that both offensive and defensive teams learn and improve together, creating sustainable security improvements.
Who it's for: Security teams, OT engineers, and compliance officers requiring validated proof of security control effectiveness. Critical for organizations in regulated industries or those facing sophisticated threat actors.
Plant-Safe Testing Protocols: Every exploit attempt is first validated in our ARC.Lab digital twin environment. Production testing occurs only during approved maintenance windows with plant operations personnel present, comprehensive rollback plans activated, and immediate emergency stop procedures available. No unsafe interactions with live process controls ever occur.
Deliverables: Executive summary with business impact analysis, detailed exploit path mapping showing attack progression, identification of detection gaps in monitoring systems, updated use cases for security monitoring tools, and comprehensive remediation recommendations with implementation timelines.
Safety and Methodology Questions
Q: How do you ensure production systems aren't impacted?
A: All exploits are pre-validated in ARC.Lab digital twins. Production testing occurs only during maintenance windows with full plant operations oversight and immediate rollback capabilities.
Q: What's the difference between red team and purple team testing?
A: Purple teaming combines offensive testing with defensive team collaboration, ensuring both sides learn and improve detection/response capabilities together.
Q: How long does a typical penetration test take?
A: 4-6 weeks including planning, ARC.Lab validation, controlled production testing, and comprehensive reporting phases.
ARC.Lab - Digital Twin Testing Environment
ARC.Lab creates virtualized replicas of real manufacturing environments, providing safe testing grounds for security validation, patch testing, and operator training without any risk to production systems.

Who it's for: OT engineers, security teams, and training coordinators requiring safe environments for testing changes, validating patches, or conducting realistic cyber incident exercises.
Virtualized replicas of your manufacturing environments for safe security testing
Our digital twin technology recreates your exact industrial control systems, network topologies, and operational processes in a controlled laboratory environment. This enables comprehensive security testing, patch validation, and incident response training without any impact on production operations.
Key Use Cases:
  • Safe exploit validation before production testing
  • Patch testing and change validation procedures
  • Incident response playbook development and validation
  • Operator and security team training scenarios
  • New technology integration testing
Outcomes & KPIs: 95% reduction in change-related incidents, 60% improvement in patch success rates during maintenance windows, 40% faster incident response through realistic training, and comprehensive documentation supporting change advisory processes.
Deliverables: Complete lab topology documentation matching your production environment, validated test scripts for common scenarios, customized training curriculum for your team, and change advisory evidence supporting production implementations.
ARC.Simulator - Crisis Preparedness
ARC.Simulator combines tabletop discussions with hands-on technical exercises in our ARC.Lab environment, providing comprehensive crisis preparedness training that tests both decision-making and technical response capabilities under realistic pressure.
01
Scenario Development
Custom incident scenarios based on your specific environment, threat landscape, and operational constraints. Realistic injects that test cross-team coordination.
02
Tabletop Exercises
Executive and management team decision-making exercises focusing on communication, escalation procedures, and business continuity decisions.
03
Hands-On Technical Response
Technical teams work through incident containment, forensic analysis, and recovery procedures using ARC.Lab digital twin environments.
04
Cross-Team Integration
Full-scale exercises combining executive decision-making with technical response teams, testing communication protocols and handoff procedures.
Who it's for: Incident response teams, executives, plant managers, and IT/OT personnel requiring validated crisis response capabilities. Essential for regulated industries and high-risk operational environments.
Outcomes & KPIs: 50% improvement in incident response coordination, 30% reduction in Mean Time to Recovery (MTTR), measurable improvements in cross-team communication effectiveness, and validated crisis communication procedures.
Deliverables: Comprehensive after-action reports with improvement recommendations, updated and validated incident response playbooks, clear roles and responsibilities matrix for all team members, and quantified incident response maturity improvements with baseline comparisons.
Exercise Structure and Benefits
Q: How realistic are the crisis scenarios?
A: Scenarios are based on actual threat intelligence and your specific environment, incorporating real attack techniques and operational constraints your organization faces.
Q: How often should crisis exercises be conducted?
A: Quarterly tabletop exercises with annual full-scale simulations, increasing frequency based on threat level and regulatory requirements.
Q: What teams should participate in exercises?
A: IT, OT, executive leadership, legal, communications, and any external partners involved in incident response procedures.